I am glad observe eHarmony responding within official web log to a write-up entitled “Marriage-Maker states tend to be Tied in Knots ” from Wall Street diary. The WSJ article examines certain matrimony stats circulated by online dating sites like eHarmony along with the methodology familiar with estimate these statistics. We spoke some about it topic as well, fourteen days ago as soon as the initial WSJ post was posted (see Story).
The WSJ article failed to look to kindly on the statistics circulated by online dating sites, and also for the many part we concur with the author. People does need to understand how these statistics tend to be generated. Of all of the internet dating sites mentioned inside WSJ post, “eHarmony stands apart as among a lot more careful ones”. This isn’t precisely a glowing report for eHarmony very, they chose to post an answer on the blog site.
Inside the eHarmony article they’re going into more details on the way they calculated that their dating website was actually accountable for 2percent of marriages in america, through the 12-month period ending March 2007. All of the details we currently knew about from a previously introduced PDF document entitled “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 wedding Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), nevertheless the article really does flush out some more details. What this web site article really does show is actually, eHarmony is wanting to-be as available and clear and their research results as is possible. I do believe the name “start telecommunications” may without a doubt be a good solution when it comes down to formal eHarmony blog site.
Here’s the full eHarmony response to the Wall Street log about how exactly they calculate their relationship research. For further information about this dating site, study our article on eHarmony.